Spirituality Guide

Yet another possibility is they have an opposition, a team of enlightened or en-knowledged beings who have been opposing their control since it started - a battle for Man across time, hidden in the lost annals of our race as (perhaps) the Seven Rishi, or the Seven Lords of Light fought against the powers of Darkness, handicapped by their desire to allow us to develop our path to Light by choice.

But there is another thought… If our reality truly depends on what we perceive, then maybe they need us to be despondent, to see the negative of life, to lose hope and foresee only an ever deepening loss of freedom and advance, where our world is so circumscribed we can hope only to be good servants of the poor overlords trying their best to keep us all alive. Then, they get the world they want, possibly forever.

And if 2012 is really a crux, truly a time of growing energy as we pass from Kali Yuga into a more enlightened Age, maybe if they can make us hopeless, the energy will not be used to bring a new age of enlightenment but instead to confirm into the darkness, our lives, our hopes and our futures and leave them as absolute rulers of an endarkened people, with the Darkness being powered by the very Light that was meant to bring us out of the mire.

This possibility is rather nasty to think upon – we should all make a determined effort to find ways to be positive in our lives, to see good things, to find hope for ourselves and others, if for no other reason than to ensure this doesn’t come to pass. Just the possibility of this being in our future should be a goad sufficient for us to stop playing the doom and gloom game and to work at bringing a little glow of positive feeling into our lives

And we will be surprised at how such a glow can infect those around us.

Be a little bud-light in your own life.

If the Puppet Masters have us so bound up, why do we even have the semblance of freedom we currently see? From that dominance, why have they not enslaved us already? Why are the reins so lightly held as to be almost invisible to anyone not looking closely? If they have the world’s money, the power centres and military in their hands, why do they not pull on the bit and get us under control?

One possibility is they are too few - this fits with the alien or secret race point of view

- they breed slow these Annunaki and there are still so few of the true blood they know they cannot yet win against a raised population of angry humanity. Such a path would seem to require a perfection of the plot, or surely we would know about it. But then again, how many times through history have people stepped forward with tales of strangeness and been laughed into silence as the BEST thing that happened to them?

Or it may be they have a plan for us to enslave ourselves – the best prison is one where the inmates police themselves and prevent each other from escaping. How many times have we seen people with a different view, a new way of looking at things, pulled back to the herd, or locked away where they cannot infect others with their ‘crazy ideas’?

Another is that they are waiting for the perfection of the controls over us, the chip implants, the energy mind controls and the robotic military they would need. This would seem, to me, to mean they had to be able to predict the advent of all these things, because the potential to control us via money and power seems to have been around a LONG time.

How can they do such things? How is it, in the (ex) land of the Free, the government can so plainly act in such totalitarian fashion? When did you and I allow our rights and freedoms to vanish so that people, who are self-evidently NOT acting in our interests, or even in a moral fashion, can reach into our lives and take them over. Why do they think they can get away with this?

I think they are becoming confident, although I am not sure I know the right reasons.

On one level, they have been running more than a century of the vastly mis-named ‘Education’ program on us all. We are taught to ‘not think’ and to compete for approval of Authority and to conform to the norm of those around us and to pull down to the common herd all those who might strive to stand above or beyond the crowd. They have a programming tool that captures almost all the public in a snare of symbols and triggers disguised as Entertainment. They are so scared that Entertainment might fail them, they keep upping the ante of shock, to the point where even minor accidents are hyped as ‘horrific’ or ‘Deadly’ and the slightest international altercation is built into a world-threatening disaster for the modern world.

So effective is their game that they can ignore situations that moral people would normally take deep umbrage at and demand action - children starve around the world while the average citizen worries about whether s/he can afford this year’s version of a t-shirt. We eagerly go into debt to buy the latest model of a car that is designed to break down and be obsolete shortly before we have it paid off.

A problem with thinking about the origin of it all, the Creation, is What created the creation? Thinking about it can get one really twisted up inside as we try to wrestle with concepts that may not only be unknown, but may actually be unknowable within this Reality. I don’t know if the Origin CAN be known until we know just what the Creation is. Until we know that we can’t really know what is outside the Creation, so it becomes a Known Unknown.

What we know is all tied up with being inside this reality – on occasion it seems as if we get glimpses of what may lie outside the boundaries which seem so complete, such as in moments of enlightenment when we glimpse connectedness and majesty in a moment that usually changes our life. Edgar Cayce may have been glimpsing outside the boundaries with his trance knowledge – the location of the Akashic knowledge may be ingrained in the fabric of reality or it may be the ‘sub-conscious’ content of Consciousness or it might be something outside of our possible experiential world altogether.

So, if we are Created, who or what created us? We can chase the question down into madness if we wish – once we decide who created us we have to ask, who created them, and so on…

If the Universe began as a Big Bang (and remember this is an hypothesis only, supported by some evidence which could also point at other conclusions, (like the background cosmic radiation) and propped up by such fancies as Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Inflation, all of which are very strange concepts in our Universe) then we are required to ask just what existed before the Big Bang. Again this marches down the regression path.

On the subject of souls, I think perhaps if we can move away from the religious connotations we find evidence of something other than bodies for both Human AND other life. The Hundredth Monkey effect was not, after all, about humans. Watch a school of fish all turn simultaneously - there is no water effect that can cause it; any such would cause more of a ripple effect to pass through the school, just like you see them do when they react to danger. But at more peaceful times, the school acts as one.

I think Life is Beingness, perhaps a Field effect but maybe something less substantial. It would explain so many things if what makes a living thing is based in something which inhabits a body, from how a person with virtually no physical brain can complete college through to how certain psi effects can operate in our lives. It would explain the effects of prayer or positive medication as well as the effects seen in transplant recipients.

I think there is enough evidence gathering to show that a human is a body, run by a brain, but overseen by a Mind run by a Being. We are finding alternate systems in the body that make the nerves seem simple and slow, and a case can be made that cells are actually a part of a sophisticated computational network that has data paths, input and output to every component and both processing and memory capabilities - all outside the brain and nervous system.

So I think people like Rupert Sheldrake and the earlier work of Bruce Lipton is pointing us in the direction of something other than the mere physical as being the sense of individuality we experience. And think about it like the Matrix - Neo is an electronic ‘body’ living in a world also created from electronics. To him it is as real as we think ours is, but in reality, he is a presence inserted into a reality not his.

What it seems to point at is that the only constant seems to be Consciousness, and that reality is a construct of Consciousness - if that is so, then it would seem eminently feasible for there to be more than one truth while we exist at the lower levels. Even if, at the connection level where all Consciousness is One, there is only Truth, we are not at that level and so can only see what is true for us.

And those truths seem to vary according to a variety of factors. Our experience seems to alter what we can see, as does our level of awareness. Pre-defined beliefs also appear to affect what we think of as reality. So in any random selection of (say) 100 people, the chances seem good that there will be at least 100 truths.

And saying there is an over-arching Truth begs the question of who it is who defines or holds that truth. Given the distinctly imaginary feel to our Reality, we cannot use the ability to find corroborating evidence within the plenum as a criteria for Truth - it might just be programmed in that way. We can’t use personal feeling for a general truth - too many have done that and killed thousands or millions. And we can’t use agreed upon values as truth - there seems no universal law that says 12 men agreeing have to be righter than one man deciding. (the democracy myth)

So I don’t know if Truth is important for us to know. But I think that, like happiness, it is very important for us to seek it.

Another issue is the amount of astronomy encoded into story, myth and scripture. When you first learn of it, it can be easy to think, coincidence, but after a while, when you’ve seen it over and over, it becomes exceedingly difficult not to accept it all as being planned into the texts. Precessional numbers and stories are also there in an amazing amount. Somebody encoded that stuff, and to do it they had to have a level of knowledge at least equal to ours.

If they could vanish, if their works could be wiped from all knowledge across the vast span of time, then surely we owe it to them to work at the remnants they left, to honour the amazing amount of effort they put into ensuring their far off descendants would have at least some warning of what may be coming our way.

Whether or not that is to do with 2012AD, I don’t know, but if Ice Ages come approximately every 100,000 years, if we are exactly halfway through a Precessional cycle right now (Orion is approaching its highest point of meridian crossing now) and if we suddenly have a Sun doing inexplicable things while it also seems the solar system itself is undergoing some strange effects, then perhaps it is past time we stopped effing around and started paying attention. We could profitably leave behind the misconception that we are the highest ever achieving society and look to the past so we are not doomed to repeat it.

If we can forget our indoctrination, leave aside those who muddy the waters using a variety of techniques, and just look with open eyes at the world we see around us, it becomes apparent there is something off about our orthodox history. There are too many things for which we have no reasonable explanations, but worse, it becomes apparent that someone is driving the moves to keep such things in the realm of the ridiculous so most people will not believe it.

So, if we don’t take a group of immortals seriously, that leaves a couple of secret groups, running an agenda across the ages, following a plan laid down in a time when, according to the fables we are being taught, high technology was a slightly sharper rock on a stick.

And keep in mind, if Glen Milne’s Inundation maps are correct - and he used stock standard geology and mapping to create them, nothing fancy - then that date is just before the last major deluge/flood event and after a couple of other bigger ones that destroyed something like 25,000,000 square miles of coastal, arable land. Given how much of our society lives near the coast or on coastal plains or within 200 feet altitude of sea level, what would such a catastrophe do to us today?

So it seems feasible that a group was created, or perhaps a then-current one went secretive, who were charged with maintain the knowledge, with keeping civilisation alive, and with continuing a plan designed to come to fruition in latter times. And many of the early civilisations not only have Flood myths and a wise man or men coming from the sea, they also have a group of seven sages who helped them along over extended periods. Such were the Shemsu Hor in Egypt’s pre-pharonic times, or the Seven Rishi of the post Vedic times.

It is possible to look back at history, even the abridged version we know about, and see an ongoing battle for direction between two groups, one which apparently believes in humans growing, becoming more than they were, and the other which believes we need to be controlled, manipulated and kept under tight rule.

Add to all of that, the Essenes - the 3rd major religious group from before and shortly after the time of the Christ. For some strange reason they don’t get much of a run in the bible yet the major players seem to have been Essenes. The Dead Sea scrolls, a far more authoritative source than the second hand copies of copies of long lost texts from which we derive our modern bible, tell a different story of those times. The Essenes appear to have been a rather hidden group of manipulators and it isn’t hard to see them playing out some long-running scheme as they prepared the maids for the role of mother of the Messiah.

With the symbology talked about in Zeitgeist and other sources, along with the real histories we are finding in archaeology as well as the Dead Sea scrolls and those of the Nag Hammadi discoveries, the books found that show a different story of Judas and Mary, among others, the Pauline manipulations that supplanted the message of the Christ to substitute overlords between a soul and its’ salvation, it isn’t hard at all to take the next step in understanding.

What becomes apparent is a long running manipulation of societies, running back to at least Egyptian times and probably further. Given the nature of the manipulations, it also seems apparent there have been at least two sides running campaigns, and those strategies have been playing out across many centuries.

Look at things like the layout of the sacred sites around the world. The pyramids copy Orion’s Belt, there are those who can show the pyramids of Egypt can be linked into patterns found in the Duat, the Egypt ‘heaven,’ a very specific area of the night sky. The Anasazi ruins can also be shown to map to star pattern, as can the Mexican and South American ruins and monuments. The most recent is probably Ankhor Wat, built between about 800AD and 1000AD, laid out similar to Draco.

The strange thing is, several of these patterns are not as the skies were at the time they were built, but as they were when Orion was at its lowest point of crossing the meridian - circa 10,500BC

Another one to read is Ralph Ellis. Ellis has looked into the history of the Hebrews, of Jesus and the origin of the Judaic religions. What he finds is fascinating. Check out Ralph Ellis’ website

Egypt has no records of having a large number of slaves, nor yet of losing a number of them in at least the hundreds of thousands, so one has to wonder why the biblical story of Moses and the Hebrews escaping the Pharaoh has so little historic documentation. A slave race able to conjure up all those plagues by calling on their God would, you would think, have a profound effect on the slave owners. It doesn’t get a mention.

Another thing not found is any mention of a Pharaoh and a large part of the army going missing. Nor is there any signs of a large number of people wandering around in the desert on the other side of the Red Sea for 40 years. You’d think the water, food scraps and piles of shit would have dessicated and remained to show [i]some[/i] sign of their passing.

And there’s more - Abraham is supposed to be a simple hill shepherd patriarch, yet somehow he musters an army when it is needed. The Ark the Hebrews had, the design of the temples, the One God emphasis, even many of their rules and traditions, all have roots in Egypt - rather strange when you consider they are supposed to have kept their culture even while slaves. Look at the Jewish faithful today - still hold true to their traditions even after centuries in other places.

The Old Testaments smells strongly of a borrowed history, complete with change of names to show a glorious past for a group who had once held the prime responsibility for the Necropolis, kicked out when the Priests of the pan-theistic Egypt reasserted their dominance over the upstart One-God crew.

Interestingly Jesus gets tied into the Pharonic lineage, and there are other stories of his travel to India and Tibet, along with tales of whom he might claim as family.

There have been a number of people looking back into our past. There seems, almost as a prelude to the 2012 symphony, to have been a chorus of enlightening discoveries and re-thinking about just how our history has been manipulated or misrepresented.

It has been realized for a long time that the winners write the history, but perhaps only recently has there been the freedom for people to go find out just what might have been covered over in those ‘revisionist’ stories. And the possibilities are mind-boggling.

For me, the first serious look I had at how I might not have a correct idea of the past came from Robert Bauval – his book The Orion Mystery, took me into strange waters. I’d always known the Great Pyramid was an incredible achievement, but Bauval showed me it could be far more than I’d dreamed.
As if a dam had burst, from there the discoveries came at rapid pace. I’d always been a it contemptuous of Erich von Daniken – his tales of aliens in our past seemed interesting but his logic turned me off – he would propose a possibility in one chapter, show some equivocal evidence, then use that proposal as if it were fact in the next chapter. At least that was how it seemed to me, being firmly in the ‘if I can’t touch it, it ain’t real’ camp at the time

The internet was starting to fire up as a real innovation around that time and I found sites dedicated to such things that were a little more carefully balanced. I also read Thoth, Architect of the Universe, by Graham Hancock and it sealed me on a path for which I have yet to see an end point.

There are darker possibilities - I wonder sometimes if it’s the magicians trick - look over there, watch that hand, ooh, voila, I have produced something from where you didn’t see it coming.

I’ve been thinking over how to help those who want us to stop focussing on the negative side of what might be coming and begin to make our minds and views more positive - I think maybe the reason the hidden players are so cautious might be to do with numbers. If significant numbers of people start to focus on an outcome, given the quantum world, maybe that outcome is more likely.

If a small number of hidden people want a particular outcome, what they have to do is either prevent the masses from dream-fulfilling the things the hidden ones don’t want or get the masses to focus on the scenario wanted by the hidden ones. Maybe that’s the reason for the media push into fear, for how only the bad news is reported and the steady increase in hype words used to report things.
eg. the swine flu thing has died in the headlines as people realised it wasn’t as bad as a cold, so they hype it again by announcing that, instead of 28,000 people having it in the US, it’s a million. You have to read down into the article to find out it’s a computer model showing how many would have it IF there are huge numbers of unreported cases - and they say there are because lots of people have had flu-like symptoms so that must be swine flu.

All of it is BS, none of it reported openly or truthfully but all of it reported so, for the large percentage of people who glance at the headlines and turn to the sports, what they see is how bad swine flu is getting.

It creates a fear and helps formulate a view of the world that helps the dark side along. If, for example, there’s a surge in power available for consciousness to change the world in 2012, and (say) 75% of the people are in fear of…whatever, what is the chance that what we all manifest is a world where our fear is justified? Particularly if the other 25% are disordered, equivocal or even in disagreement as to just which positive outcome they want?

So what is coming in 2012AD? Should we be scared, will the Earth end or the forces of good and evil engage in the Armageddon of the biblical stories? Or will it be a time of resurrection of Jesus, a growth in cosmic harmony, or an energetic increase allowing greater awareness to all mankind?

There’s been any number of prophecies of doom or end of the world over the years. The Christians have apparently been awaiting it, and predicting every hiccup in society as being the harbinger of the Christ’s return, for most of 2000 years. Almost every culture has some story of how the world will end, or when, from the Tibetans nine billion names of God to the Hopi returning through a siapu into their next world.

But from the Mayans, all we have is the calendar. To be sure we think we know considerably more of them now than we did fifty years ago, but still all that we have is a date back around 3113BCE plus the 5125 years of a baktun, which brings us to 2012AD. At that point, the calendar ends. At that point, the Age ends.

Almost eerily, but nowhere near as exactly, it is also the time of the changing of the Age of Pisces to the Age of Aquarius. It is also close to half the Great year of the Egyptians, when the constellation of Orion reaches the highest point of culmination (where it crosses the North-South meridian) in its Precessional trek up and down the sky.

So we are left wondering about what is coming. Some people are talking a vast surge of fourth dimensional energy to transform the world. According to them some will be ready and will move to the next phase of existence – I’ve never been quite able to work out what these prognosticators think is going to happen to those unable to make the transition. Strangely, all those making this kind of prediction are on the transformative side of the line that determines who goes.

Others see it as a time when Aliens will make themselves known, transforming the world and altering forever our view of ourselves. Still others see it as a crux, a time when the final (?) battle between Good and Evil will rage, fulfilling the biblical prophecies of war and salvation as the Christ comes back to save the faithful.

Unconscious - this might be a definition problem. I think the concept of unconscious quite often is used as another way to say subconscious. What is described isn’t a thing of not-knowingness, but rather one of not-awareness.

I’ve posted here about spotlight and floodlight awareness - what is described as unconscious could easily be from the floodlight awareness - the ’spotlight’ Being doesn’t see it and isn’t aware of it but the ‘floodlight’ Being is active and working on the problem until s/he can present it to the spotlight being.

I’ve used this process for a lot of my life. When something comes for which I don’t have (but do need) an answer, I consciously work through it as far as I can. Then once I am satisfied I have thought of all the possibilities, worked out responses to all them, (and still don’t have a best solution) I consign the problem to the ‘back of my brain’ so to speak. I consciously determine to not think of it anymore and to rely on my background processing to find an answer - it usually does. Some time later, while doing something else entirely, I will suddenly have the answer pop out.

But this isn’t ‘unconscious’ but rather a subconscious process - while it isn’t at the focus of my attention, I am still spending mental resources on it - at times, when the problem has been particularly needful, I can almost feel the system whirring in the background as I go about my day.

For me, Un-Conscious would be more along the lines of (say) the reason I came to this life, or perhaps the bias I have towards certain modes of expressing my ethical nature. It is arguable that we pick these things up from childhood, but I am one who deliberately rejected my early life, who found I had to consciously decide my standards and morals by trial and error. And along the way I found there was a basic, a standard which determined which I would accept and which I would not - and I can’t see how it could come from my parents.

I think there is a lot more (and in another sense, a lot less) to it than the rather mechanistic view they are offering. It is strange but psychology seems determined to stick with the purely physical explanations for the ephemera of human experience while biology seems to be firmly racing in the esoteric direction.

I’ve posted elsewhere here about the work of biologists Rupert Sheldrake and Bruce Lipton involving fields and cells. Now from the findings of epigenetics we are getting research into just what mechanisms are in use to alter the gene expression in the body - and once again we are back to fields.

When a person alters their world view, there are no physical processes that can switch the genes on and off because there is no measurable difference in the brain. But on the other hand, the MIND alters and the mind is a hologram. The owner of the mind makes a change and the field of the mind alters and that change gets conveyed along channels other than the chemical nervous system into every cell, with dramatic, provable results in the DNA of the cells.

It would seem from Lipton’s early work, that the field that is the owner of the donated organ or limb, is still connected to the organ or limb, and maybe remains so until the immunosuppression drugs give time for the new owner to literally replace all the cells with home grown ones which are no longer tagged for the original field.

So the structure of a human would seem to be, A field or perhaps spirit which holds an identity, a field which is generated by the body/brain, an electrical system that communicates across the whole body almost instantaneously, a computational system with both a mainframe in the head as well as distributed processing throughout the body, and a visceral system for physical sustenance and a chemical one for gross messages throughout the system.

Personally I wonder if the body field might be what Sheldrake calls the morphogenetic field (MF) while the Being is a field derived from Source. I think maybe the Spirit comes to experience and the MF learns along the way. I speculate that if the MF learns enough, perhaps it can maintain identity instead of being absorbed back into the Earth or species MF and so we get past life memories.

Or perhaps it is Spirit which, if it achieves a high enough level, might maintain identity or self enough to carry along memories of prior existence.

But it seems fairly reasonable, from the findings of biology and those researching energy medicine and energy psychology, that to be a human is far beyond being a body.