Spirituality Guide

By: Seeker
I have gone through just how religion has failed us, how it was corrupted very early on into a tool for the powerful to keep control of the masses. We grow up believing in the corruption as Truth and the powerful use that corrupted belief to manipulate us and get us to go kill on command - hardly a path of Light by anyone’s description.

But there are many people out there who hold other views than those of Christianity. Some are lapsed Christians and here we need to be careful to distinguish between those who have found alternate views out of guilt for their lapses and those who have found new ways to live and think based on superior knowledge or results.

I’m not sure which camp I belong in although I try earnestly to seek a path that leads to Light through knowledge; perhaps because of how I have lived my life, it seems to me the logic of our existence and the lessons we see all around us, and even the traits which distinguish Man from animal all point towards knowledge being the path the wisdom and/or enlightenment.

I think that, perhaps like the beliefs of those persecuted throughout recent history (ie. since the Christ) by the established Church, I lean towards there being a Light and a Dark path, but I’m unsure as to whether either of them are ‘evil’ in the Christian sense. It may be more simple than that – Light is the path that leads to mastering the physical cosmos and moving on to ‘higher’ realms to start over at a new level, while Dark is the path that involves staying bound ‘in the flesh’ and with full focus on the physical as being all there is of the Universe.

By: Seeker
You may be wondering what I meant in the previous post about an example of a new paradigm being hijacked. Those who have read earlier posts of mine should be able to guess to what I am referring.

The message of the Christ was of love and personal connection. Over and again he told us that salvation comes from oneself, from how we see and what we accept into our lives. And over and again he tells us the path is through only him, that the connection is to God from each individual. It is quite clear when you read it and it is hard to see him as meaning anything else other than what he said.

So what happened? Well, it seems, although those times are a little murky a difficult to see due to time passed and the destruction of the evidence, that for the first few decades, the message was passed out via the apostles and disciples that salvation was available. The Gnostics maintain it is through knowledge, that one needs to find their path with open eyes and learn as one travels the harder road. Mystics throughout the ages have said much the same thing.

But what has come down from those times to the mainstream societies is something wildly different. Now the message is we need an intermediary, a person of authority to stand between us and salvation, to accept our confessions and grant us absolution, to explain in precise detail just which laws we need to follow to ensure that when we get to those Pearly Gates we will be allowed access.

And if you fail in even the slightest way to obey every command or even wish of the Authority, you get to burn forever in a Hell never even mentioned by the Christ.

By: Seeker
What is going on in the world? Why is it that religion has largely become irrelevant yet the science that has replaced it is not bringing more happiness to the world?

Well when one tries over and over to achieve something, and keeps failing at the job in spite of earnest efforts, there are a couple of possibilities as to what is happening.

One is that there is someone else working to ensure the efforts do not achieve results. The other is that one has an incorrect view of things, that the basis on which one is exerting effort is false or misleading in some way, leading to the effort being misdirected or wasted. Or both.

We have, in the West, an outstanding example of how a new paradigm can be hijacked, with a new way of doing things and seeing our lives being co-opted by the powers-that-be to assist them in their control of the population. And it relates directly to this forum.

We can debate the origin of the new paradigm endlessly, we can find points of contention almost ad infinitum, but to me, this is separation, this is the limiting of connectivity similar to that which led to the Jonestown massacre or the Waco tragedy. What we need to do is recognize that each of us seeking a new way, each Being who is engaged in traversing this life and learning about this universe, is a valid Being. They have a point of view and they have value.

If you and I are exactly the same, one of us is unnecessary.

By: Seeker
A problem many people have in trying to find a better way to live is that the reality in which they are embedded is so pervasively aligned into the indulgence of the physical senses. Every day, every hour, we are exposed to influences designed very carefully to guide us into buying more, into letting our physical senses dictate what will fill our lives.

This is arguably the exact opposite of the way to go. Our society is distinctly NOT filled with happy and contented people, rather the opposite. We export our way of life to countries that have histories that beggar the short span of our ‘democratic’ world as if we have discovered something special and worth having. It seems from the results however, that all we’ve done is export our misery to them.

It seems so worthwhile to be able to afford anything we want to make our lives easier and happier. The new technology around us is stunning in its complexity and facility, and it isn’t difficult to see how they could change our lives, yet somehow we seem to head steadily in the direction of more people looking for escape, more people turning to drugs, legal and illegal, longer queues in the medical centres and escalating levels of violence across the world. Accompanying all this, and perhaps the cause of most of it, is a mounting helplessness in affecting the world in which we live.

Anyone who thinks things through can tell you how useless it is to have elections to select our leaders – I doubt there is a ‘democratic’ country on Earth where a citizen could give a meaningful explanation of the differences between the two political parties for whom they can vote.

By: Seeker
In the New Age movement, there appears on the surface to be little coherence. Anyone interested in finding a new way of life is faced with a spectrum of ideas and methods for achieving it that ranges from the subl;ime to the truly ridiculous and even to the downright dangerous.

People convinced they were heading for a personal Nirvana willingly took the cordial in Jonestown, dying for their belief. Others suicided so they could get picked up by the spaceship travelling behind the Hale-Bopp comet. People in Waco managed to find a way to so scare the authorities they got attacked by the FBI and died in bullet-storm and fire.

So trying to find a new way can be hazardous to one’s health. What does seem, to me at least, common among the ones that have shown as dangerous is they lead towards severing contact with others. When I look at the groups involved, they appear to be concentrated on exclusivity and being special, rather than reaching out for greater and closer contact with others or the universe around them.

Like the fanatical among the various religions in the world, these are people who are pulling in their horizons, finding ways to see themselves as having a special relationship with their beliefs and so losing contact with reality. This makes it easy for someone to guide them into paths that are low survival ways to live.

It seems to me that any New Age life, any development in the path to enlightenment or a better future, must necessarily involve breaking down barriers, needs to open the individual up to greater contact and involvement, rather than limiting them to a specific set of thoughts.

By: Seeker
The modern scientific world in which we live seems to be rooted firmly in the purely physical. In the Western world it would seem that the battle between religion and science has been fought and won. We see the results of the investigation into the rational and observable all around us. And yet, there are signs that things are not what they may seem to be.

When the word fundamentalist is used, most in the USA think of Muslims, yet many in the West outside the US see a large percentage of the US population that same way. The whole ‘let’s teach Intelligent Design as Science’ has a tendency to provoke incredulousness from those who are outside the US.

We can go further back – in the 1930’s there was a fundamentalist wave of fervor that swept across the western world – Pentecostalism was like a drug that had found a ready market. The ‘crusade’ eventually died down and became more mainstream, but to this day there are many who find their relief in such places.

The 1960’s brought a renewal of Consciousness in the form of the Love generation – a whole generation found Love in a new way, looking for alternatives to the old ways of doing things, they came close to derailing the capitalist views and perhaps setting the world on a new course towards togetherness. Looking back I can’t help but wonder if it was the ready acceptance of psychedelic drugs that caused the movement to peter out as it did. Many of those who are now in positions of power came through those times swearing to make change – instead they got absorbed into the mainstream and nothing came of their lofty good intentions.

What did come of it however, was the whole New Age phenomenon which, to this day, is still blossoming out in unexpected directions.

By: Seeker
How likely is it that we are living in a system which is travelling through space towards and away from a companion to the Sun? A few years back the concept would have been a bit ‘out there’ as it was thought that the Sun wasn’t special, that most stars would be singular. More recently, with better instruments, we are finding that the Sun is highly unusual if it is truly a single star – most of what we see out there are multiple star systems and some of the companions are very strange indeed.

Walter Cruttenden speculates in his book ‘Lost Star of Myth and Time’ that maybe the importance of Sirius to our ancestors is indicative of a possible companion. He has more than myth to go on. The book is definitely worth a read.

Taking his cue from the past, Cruttenden speculates that there is more truth than we give credence to in the old stories. Is it possible that once we had a far more spiritual life, that in the past we lived differently, with less reliance on the physical and more understanding of our place in the cosmos?

It would explain many puzzles about our existence if, at some past time, we had abilities that no longer are under our control. It could give answers to how supposed primitives were able to build as they did, and maybe explain why all our early known civilizations seem to begin full-fledged’ rather than spending long periods developing the sophistication we see in the earliest cities.

Add in the possibility of a series of major disasters at the close of the last Ice Age and we are looking at possible answers to the questions asked earlier.

By: Seeker
One of the things that come from myth as well as religious texts that have come down to us from the past, is the concept that, in the past, things were better. That, once upon a time, there was a Golden Ages, when Gods walked the Earth and were known to us, or sometimes when we ourselves were as Gods, capable of thinking and doing things that have since been lost to us.

The Fall of Man is a story repeated in most of the old religions and civilizations for which we have records. The bible tells it twice – once when Adam and Eve fell from the Garden and again when God destroyed it all with a flood and Noah had to start things off again.

The Vedas, the history of those who became the Hindu race, tell of cycles of existence. They call them Yugas and tell us there are four descending yugas and four ascending yugas. In each half cycle there are the Satya (or Krita) yuga, Treta yuga, Dvapara yuga and the Kali yuga. In the Greek tradition these are the Gold, Silver, Bronze and Iron ages – both lists are shown in descending order.

Walter Cruttenden wonders if maybe the old stories of ages and cycles may perhaps link into Precession and if maybe the yugas or ages are referring to the approach and departure from the companion to the Sun. He speculates that just as the energy of the Sun currently sustains us, affecting not only the seasons and weather but also our moods and vitality, perhaps the extra energy from another source as we grow closer to it would provide heightened awareness, extra energy with which to find and understand the world and universe around us.

By: Seeker
We know Precession of the Equinox occurs, we can measure it. We know the Ancients knew of it because they use precessional numbers in their stories and myths and incorporate it into monuments and buildings. But Precession is apparently not caused by the things currently assumed to cause it.

Precession is an orbital phenomena; ie. You need to have an orbit for it to be seen at all. What isn’t common knowledge is that we don’t really have a very good idea of the motion of the solar system through space. Recently we have noticed that it seems likely that our Solar System isn’t actually a native member of the Milky way galaxy – it seems we’re immigrants. So are a number of nearby star systems. This explains, for example, why the Milky Way in the sky is at an oblique angle to the ecliptic when we look at it; it seems likely that, were we native to the Milky Way, our Solar System would be rotating in the plane of the Milky Way.

So if earth is precessing across the constellations as it orbits, but it isn’t precessing as compared to things within the Solar System, what is going on?

Cruttenden and his team think the Solar System is doing the precessing. This implies the Sun is actually in orbit around something other than the centre of the galaxy. Or maybe, as well as the centre of the galaxy. In the book ‘Lost Star of Myth and Time’ he explores possibilities of just what we may be orbiting as well as a more complete picture of the reasons behind why they think this way.

So, what does this have to do with Spirituality? Or even with our history as it perhaps really was instead of how we are taught to view it in school?

By: Seeker
Each year, as Earth travels its almost eternal circle round the Sun, there are some events that proceed like clockwork. There are a couple of annual meteor showers that happen regularly, causing streaks of light to cross our night sky and drawing wonderment from those looking up.

If the Earth is precessing in orbit, which pretty much means it isn’t in exactly the same place on a given date of the year, then the meteor events should be changing their dates, slowly but steadily across the years – and they aren’t.

There’s a longer term confirmation of this as well. Earth and Venus both travel around the Sun, and orbital mechanics says that Venus must travel faster than Earth. Those same orbital mechanics say that every 105.5 years or every 121.5 years, Venus will pass between the earth and the Sun. This can only happen in early June or early December and the transits occur in pairs eight years apart.

The issue here is that if earth were really moving backwards in orbit each year as current Precession theory assumes, we could not have regular transits at all – the transit is partly due to the different speeds at which Earth and Venus travel and partly to do with just where the orbit of Venus ‘crosses’ the plane of Earth’s orbit. Move earth even slightly away from the June or December point in space & the ‘crossing’ will not occur when Earth is there to see it.

So it seems that Precession cannot be as we think it to be. If it isn’t a wobble due to external planetary or mass influences from the rest of the Solar System, what causes it? And why is it changing?

By: Seeker
There are a couple of things that don’t quite fit with the Precession theory. One is the accuracy and how we’ve been adjusting the theory of why it happens.

Currently the idea is that Precession occurs because the Earth wobbles as it orbits, like a spinning top wobbles as it spins. Newton thought this was because of the gravitational effects from the Sun and Moon. Earth travels around the Sun with a ‘counterweight’ swinging around it. This causes effects in the Earth orbit as the Moon pulls on the Earth just as Earth pulls on the Moon.

Unfortunately, this doesn’t account for all the effects we observe, so over the recent centuries since Newton, various people have added in extra effects caused, including the other planets and even larger asteroids. And still the calculations don’t quite work out.

Another problem is that the apparent length of the time for 1º of Precession is changing. This is rather hard to account for as the Solar System seems a fairly settled place – it’s not like there’s mass being added to change the balances. And we measure fairly carefully so it isn’t that the orbit of Earth around sun is changing, nor the days getting shorter or longer.

There’s also a problem that it seems, until Cruttenden and his team saw it, nobody else had thought about. If Precession is simply the Earth changing its precise place in orbit for a given time each year, (the vernal equinox is where it is traditionally measured) then events based on fixed orbital location relative to the sun should also be changing dates – and they don’t.

By: Seeker
Walter Cruttenden has a theory. He has devoted considerable time and effort into trying to disprove his theory. Instead the group he founded has been moving steadily in the direction of firmer ground, finding more corroboration of the theory and nailing down the details.

This is how Science is meant to work, but there are groups around who have corrupted the process and so many now don’t have the respect for Science that it (mostly) deserves.
An example of how NOT to do Science is to have an hypothesis, look around for data, discard all the data that contradicts the hypothesis, modify measurements that may falsify your hypothesis, then perform inappropriate analysis and use incorrect statistical methods to ‘prove’ your original claim. Add to that the suppression of any and all opinions and research that might count against the original claim, indulge in extensive propaganda to promote the idea and use standard propaganda techniques to convince the people who don’t know the Science of it all of how right you are about it.

In other words, be the IPCC (Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change) trying to convince the world that human carbon dioxide is responsible for sending Earth into a runaway warming that will bake us all and make life unlivable and that the only way to stop it all is to tax everyone for producing carbon dioxide.

Real Science is about having an idea, then going out to find what might make the idea wrong. If the data doesn’t fit, discard the idea, not the data. Walter Cruttenden has walked this path and his idea is rather startling, to say the least.

By: Seeker
How is it possible that the ancients could have achieved so much? Why is it there seems so little of what they had left behind? How can we have forgotten so much of our past?

The only reason it seems a huge amount for ancient Man to achieve is because we have assigned them the time frame that says, around 4,000BCE, we first stopped being hunter-gatherers and we began to farm. We have this concept that somehow, farming is the beginning of civilized history. To hold this belief, we must necessarily ignore the inconvenient findings around the world of things that pre-date our supposed conversion to farming life.

We have another concept and that is that our way of life is the only and best way to have a high quality of life. To do this we have to ignore a lot of what is wrong with our society. If we look around with a critical eye, this is distinctly NOT a happy world. We have so many problems confronting us that most people have long since stopped looking and retreated into one or another form of escapism. It is a human condition to want to think of what we have as being better than what went before. Imagine the psychoses we’d be facing if it was widely accepted that our society is worse than ones built many thousands of years ago?

I’ve talked in earlier posts about why we’ve forgotten so much of our past. Catastrophe tends to leave the survivors focused on the immediate needs of survival; detailed information about things now irrelevant gets lost, relegated to stories told around campfires or to children late at night.

One man who has another idea about this is Walter Cruttenden. Like many men and women who find out new things, Walter began with a mystery and began a journey that has taken him a long way from where he started.

By: Seeker
The Ancients knew many more things than modern views of history give them credit for – there are mysterious ruins and monuments built using either means beyond what we allow them or involving moving multi-ton stone across many kilometers. There’s the way they carved and shaped stone for which they had no tools to use. And there’s anomalous knowledge, things they provably knew but which they couldn’t have known given how we think they lived.

We have maps dating from the 15th century, based on older knowledge, that incorporates mathematics only discovered a couple of centuries later, showing not just the Antarctic, (yet to be discovered) showing not only a fairly accurate rendition of the coastline, (considering it was a copy of an older map) but showing that coastline as it is without the ice! That has to qualify, according to what we think we know, as impossible.

As it turns out, that section of the Antarctic has more evidence to offer us from modern times. Core samples taken off the coastline show river sediments, (interestingly, just where the old maps show there were rivers) that give a time of around 7,000BCE when the rivers were flowing and carrying life sediments into the sea. The implication is that for a considerable period, at least that part of Antarctica was ice free.

But, and it’s a big but, that means someone in 7,000BCE was around with the skills to navigate the treacherous Southern Ocean and the society behind them capable of building vessels capable of surviving the trip PLUS having been around long enough to develop the various parts of knowledge needed to map accurately, to determine accurate latitude and longitude and, more significantly, the mathematics to transcribe global maps to a flat plane, as that is precisely what the 15th century maps show.

By: Seeker
If we have evidence of prior civilizations, what happened? How could we reach such pinnacles and fall back into the dark? Why do the mystics tell us of times when we were much more than we now are, when we knew and could do things that sound, to we sophisticates in the modern societies, like made up fantasies?

One thing the Ancients knew about that is indisputable is the Precession of the Equinoxes. Now it isn’t impossible to notice how, on a given day of the year, the constellations appear to move slightly in the sky. Across the lifetime of a modern man, a constellation will move about 1º ‘backwards as compared to the way Earth’s rotation and orbit make it seem to move.

Over many centuries, the movement is obvious – Christ was born around the time the constellation in the East just before dawn on the vernal (Spring) equinox was changing from Ares to Pisces. Currently we are changing from Pisces to Aquarius.

But there comes a number of questions – 1º is not a large movement to notice across seventy years. According to our view of history as taught conventionally, the ravages of life in ancient times meant short life spans. So it would take quite a number of lives before the apparent movement could be large enough to notice. Also the complete cycle is over 25,000 years long; conventional history says we only kicked off civilization about 7,000 years ago.

The questions are, how did the ancients find out and accurately map the Precession? Why did they find it so important they incorporated it into myth and stone?