Stranger Than Fiction
Wednesday, June 24th, 2009
We now have building evidence of how changing a mind can alter which genes are being expressed on an almost real-time rate.
We also have cell structures that alter regularly - neurons turn out to have a ’skeletal’ structure which rebnews almost hourly, which is why the brain can restructure so readily when new information comes in and also goes some way towards explaining the plasticity of memory.
So yes, Attitude may not only be important, it could very well be the entirety of the causative factors that determine significant amounts of our daily lives.
It’s interesting to note, just in how many areas the orthodox view of biology is being rewritten.
It’s been something I’ve puzzled over a long time - why does the body have an electrical nature? It actually doesn’t seem necessary for nerves - that’s a (from memory) sodium/calcium process where ions are exchanged and the ‘electrical’ signals of the brain don’t seem to be needed in the body, yet the whole body has an electrical field so sensitive that we can detect mood by measuring skin resistance changes.
Now we’re beginning to understand why. If we look at the body as a building, we’ve been looking at the elevators and saying, ‘that’s how buildings communicate’ and now we’re finding the phone and closed-circuit TV systems. Guys like Sheldrake and Lipton are looking at the microwave antenna on the roof and starting to define how the building receives input from the owner. Others are defining the ways in which maintenance gets told by the tenants which systems to run and which aren’t important enough to prioritise. And we’re starting to map the information channels into each room so we can organise more effectively both the local room activity AND the co-ordination of the building output.
Science is finding that meditation and prayer have quantifiable benefits, but only when done personally and with involvement from deep in ourselves, yet how many of us have been taught structured prayers to say, meaningless patter that doesn’t require any personal level of attachment to the words?
If all this speculation is right, being worried about the world around us if like being worried if you’re behaving right in a dream you had last night. If the world around us is a creation of ours, if how we see it can change what we experience, then it would seem it is what is in us that matters.
…you will find views of it which look radically different from what you see in the sky - simply because the ‘collector’ isn’t being limited to the tiny amount your eye can see - change the frequency and the picture is entirely different.
Not only is the cosmos a fake, a creation of consciousness, but in these bodies we don’t even see all of the fake! We live in a box that only partially resembles what is actually present in the hologram. We’re inside a world where it may not be real, where it might all be a creation of our own consciousness and yet we are unable to perceive anything but the tiniest fleck of it.